All posts by stevestevelovellidau
Fleur and the Photographer
She is nude and I adore her – always have, always will. I don’t really know her and we’ve never spoken – except for in my imagination. I know nothing about her apart from her name – and even that may be a furphy. My relationship with her has been longer than any other I have had with a woman – she’s been with me for decades. It was commenced so long in the past I now have only the vaguest memory of the occasion of our first contact.
I know our eyes first locked through a window, although I suspect mine were quickly drawn to her other attributes – for even back then she was unclad, the hussy. She came into my world disrobed and so she remains. We have shared quite a few bedrooms since that day and I can safely say that my regard for her has never diminished, despite the time we have been together. She would have seen me at my lowest, at my happiest and perhaps even at my most triumphant. She would never let on about all of that as she’s my trusted keeper of secrets.
Fleur is a framed image of an unclothed maiden, aged in her early twenties I would judge. She is posed naked in a sitting position with only some judiciously placed gauzy material across her lap. She is holding a hairbrush and wears some pieces of period bling. Where I purchased her I have no recall – only that I espied her through some shop plate glass. I figure she has been with me for at least half my life.
Countless times I have looked at Fleur and speculated on her story. Who was she? What enticed her to be posing nude. Who was her photographer? The initials JA do appear in one corner as a clue. When exactly was her image transferred onto paper? To me she could be Edwardian or a lass of the Jazz Age. I don’t have the intimate knowledge of historical accoutrements to decide on that. Perhaps it is the former due to her luxurious locks and she does not have the slim form favoured by the later period – but that is pure supposition. Was she French, given that they were the trend setters in the early decades of last century in the post-card trade featuring such beauties posing dishabille? It was a good little earner for photographers back then. But maybe that’s just wishful thinking, being the francophile that I am. If not, what nationality then? So much to discover about her, so little to go on!
Not so long ago I made a foray onto Google to see if I could ‘uncover’ any clues as to her provenance, using the various meagre clues her portraiture gave. This was to no avail despite the various combinations of wording I used. I will not be beaten. I will make future attempts. If worst comes to worst, I will endeavour to write a fictional account and entrust it to my blog. Stay tuned.
Although the datasphere didn’t throw any light on Fleur, I must admit I made a few discoveries that piqued my interest enough to delve a little deeper. One of these was happening across one A A Allen. What an interesting fellow – and what a life he led! Of course there is a link to my lady in this as he was in the habit of photographing the young women of his day in the same way as per Fleur.
Of course this was not unusual, for as long as there has been a camera the photographing of the fairer gender in various stages of disrobing wasn’t unheard of. For the first decades of my passion’s existence, as photographic techniques gradually became more sophisticated, this practice was largely ‘underground’ in response to the Victorian mores of the time. It was mainly for prurient purposes akin to, I suppose, today’s much more accessible internet porn. But there were some photographers who took the higher ground, believing their work to be an art form in itself. After all, nudity in painting, illustration and sculpture was perfectly acceptable under the guise of art, so why not in their line of work or hobby? I think our A A would have probably have had a foot in both camps.
For his purposes he had two factors going for him. History is somewhat vague about him but we do know he was independently wealthy – his rich parents supporting him through the early stages of his ‘career’. We know he spent today’s equivalent of a couple of million dollars setting himself up with the necessary gear and studio to carry out his business. What he produced he could not openly sell despite society, by the time this New Englander had made his way to California in 1921, becoming less morally rigid. It all worked on subscription, sort of like receiving ‘Playboy’ through the post, with one difference – if he was caught doing so he was in deep do-do. So with his private income and his subscribers he had the necessary dosh to hire models to do his bidding. His other ‘asset’ was, that as a result of a motorcycle accident, he was severely disfigured and was unable to move freely (although we do know he produced at least one child.) Maybe his subjects felt ‘safe’ in his presence because of his lasting injuries. And of course in the twenties nudity was starting to become acceptable in the silent movies of the era. For an ambitious wannabe actress, disrobing was often not a place too far. Think the lustrous Louise Brooks. This all ties in as well to the end of the Great War. Although not as pronounced as elsewhere, the void left by the doughboys heading off to Flanders was filled by women doing the work of men, giving them a freedom unheard of in previous decades. Once the soldiers returned it was all expected to revert to normal, except that many of the fairer sex quite liked their new found liberties. With the males again in the ascendency in the workforce, how was a girl of her times to support herself? Across the world many were drawn to the glamour centres where the risque side of life held sway, places such as Paris or Berlin. For America California and its burgeoning entertainment industry was the place to make one’s name. Anyway, for whatever reason, A A had the means to convince numerous girls to partake in his fantasies, often in multiple numbers. He chose a certain type, all slim with a twenties bob, even training them in what we would now call a ‘boot camp’ manner so his girls would possess his desired physical form for his tableaux. At one stage he proposed to produce moving pictures of his belles as well, but as the thirties approached and the Depression bit his plans fell through – and then there was soon the obstacle of the Hayes Code as the puritans regained the upper hand.
As the times started to clamp down on his dreams, so Mr Allen starts to slip from view. He had felt that the 1930s would be his decade, a time when, weather permitting, even the average Joe and Josephine would go about their daily tasks unfettered by the limitations of clothing. Instead his business collapsed as he found himself in hot water with the authorities for daring to send what the law termed ‘obscene material’ through the mail. The only sign of A A was that occasionally his name would pop up as a snapper for early naturist magazines. He passed away in 1962, much of his vast output lost forever.
These days what remains has been reassessed and now exhibitions of his oeuvre have been presented. Slowly old A A is coming in from the cold. His work is adjudged to have a contemporary feel because it wasn’t retouched, as was the common practice in his day. He believed in total honesty with what he was portraying. Of course, if nudity does not offend, you may decide for yourselves on the veracity of this with a simple insertion of his name into a search engine to provide galleries of his work
Of course it would be drawing a long bow to think the paths of my Fleur and A A Allen crossed. It would be too much of a coincidence to think she was one of the subjects he trained so rigorously to feature in his various series of images. Fleur remains on my wall in my man cave – and she will always have a home with me. And I’ll continue to be ever-wondering about her. Her story will be told – one way or another!
Huon Calm
Ten Days on the Island
There’s been a bit on in the realm of the Blue Room of late!
As January segued into its following month, two beautiful women came to stay by the river to gladden the heart of this old scribe. My sister flew in from the endless sun of Mangoland to experience our southern capital’s less predictable climes for a week. Frith, named after the feisty heroine of Paul Gallico’s wartime saga ‘The Snow Goose’, once was, for a brief time, a resident of Hobart herself way back in the dim mists of time. Visits have been few since. She left this island many moons ago to be a navy-man’s wife, returned for a time to Tassie’s North West, before escaping the winter chill she abhorred to the warm grasp of the Sunshine Coast. She and husband Glen have been wonderful hosts to me on my several occasions in Maroochydore, so now I was proud to return the compliment; to introduce her to the little abode under Kunanyi , Mt Wellington’s new/ancient name. She would see the changes wrought on Hobart over the years since her own time beside the Derwent.
Accompanying her was stunning daughter Peta, bringing with her the glamour of big city Melbourne life, her home of late. Peta has used her talent as a dancer to see our earthly orb from cruise ship sorties to the four corners; to play fairy tale belles at Japan’s Disney World and to entertain a hundred thousand at that ‘one day in September.’ With a radiant smile, a whiff of exotic scents and a zestful take on life, this gorgeous young lady charms all lucky enough to enter her orbit.
The occasion for their visit was the eighty-seventh birthday of a remarkable woman – my mother. The event was held at the Asian Gourmet, an eatery gracing one of the piers protruding into Sullivan’s Cove on Hobart’s docks. Lovells, partners and offspring from all over the island gathered to experience tasty tucker, catch up on the doings of each other and to celebrate their good fortune in calling Alwyn mother, mother-in-law, gran and great-grandmother. Hobart turned on its glorious best that sunny Sunday arvo for the coming together. The harbour pulsated with sea craft and the tourists were snapping for all they were worth. The attendees were transfixed, though, by the little people. None older than half a decade – Mia, Evie, Tessa Tiger, Charlie and Thomas (as well as a new addition on the way) enlivened proceedings with their palpable pleasure at being part of another adventure, their inquisitiveness at he sights around them and their tentative steps towards forming relationships with each other.
As the week progressed tours were taken away from the wee riverside abode. Peta was entranced by another form of Disneyland – the adults playground that MONA, as the city’s leading attraction, has become. She pronounced it ‘way cool.’ Shopping expeditions were mounted to the Salamanca Market, the CBD, the emporiums of collectibles at New Norfolk and the stationary train at Margate. Nothing lasts forever and all too soon Nan was wending her way back to Burnie; Peta and Frith to Yarra City.
But for this aspiring chronicler of events, these happenings were not the only notable occurrence to be had. In a joyous coincidence and for me a matter of immense pride, that very weekend my adored daughter graced the local daily as the feature article of its weekend supplement. Her lovely face appeared on the cover, with, on the inside, more images to savour of her little family – hubby Leigh and the mini-wonder that is Tessa Tiger. Tim Martain did a great job of wordsmithery in tracing my daughter’s progress from her upbringing in provincial Wynyard to finally calling Hobs home; in recounting her previous literary publications and flagging her upcoming one – ‘Writing Clementine’. All of it was pure unadulterated bliss for a proud father to peruse.
And now I am away from the southern city I love, penning these words on the same coast that saw my daughter and son born and nurtured, as well as being home for the bulk of my own adult life. Another remarkable mother is my host, my Leigh’s mum in Pat. She treats me royally, plying me with the rhubarb I love and other culinary treats. Another occasion bought us north – the seventh consecutive twenty-fifth birthday bash of Leigh’s cherished daughter, Ilsa. Yesterday again there were family and friends meeting up at their ‘ranch’ under the flanks of Roland. The barbie was fired up by husband Keith and fine, expertly cooked meaty fare was partaken of. In the past twelve months this Sheffield couple have had much to celebrate as their industriousness is paying dividends in their chosen community. Keith is now sought after to lend a hand in garden and household maintenance around local traps with Ilsa’s managerial skills having an impact on local businesses. In the little time remaining to them they work together to restore a dwelling on the outskirts of town to make a fine home for their son, my mate Little Ford Man. He is a treasure, never ceasing to amaze his besotted grandmother and I with his ability to observe, figure it all out and then replicate. When Brynner raises his arms up to me, then lifts a leg to signify he has deemed it to be a time I should lift him up for a higher view of proceedings, I feel humbled that I have a place in his world too.
We travel back south later this day and routines around the Blue Room for the remainder of the week will return to their normal rhythms. No doubt I will cast my mind back over these ‘ten days on the island’ and contemplate their significance. Of course, in a worrisome world there is always the positive constant that is family. I will ponder on the talent that is possessed within the family group – my daughter’s writing, Peta’s dancing, Keith’s for landscaping, Ilsa’s for organisation, for instance – and where those capabilities will lead their possessors. I will ruminate on the little mites at the Asian Gourmet that sunshiny afternoon and think on how they will make their way along their, as yet unscripted, life’s journey. There are still so many unanswered questions and this old fellow is determined to be around for a while longer to see some of them answered.
Geeveston View
Excess
With my two most recent cinematic viewings I’ve been taken to a contemporary cinematic world way beyond my experience – to the wildest parties on the planet! Me – even in my pomp I was never much of a party-goer. I don’t think I’ve been to one for decades. I’ve loved the after events of the weddings of my stunning niece and several handsome nephews. Here it’s mainly family – I can relax. One of the best post-nuptials I’ve been to is when a beautiful teaching colleague married her debonair policeman. That night I laughed till I cried. I still remember the round table discussion about Melbourne’s Sexpo. When coppers let the hair down, much fun is to be had. The same could be said for nurses. My Darling Loving Partner is a nurse and she’s taken me to some rip-snorters of work dos. But it’s dinner gatherings – at restaurants or in homes – that I look forward to the most. There was the one following my daughter marrying my favourite son-in-law on the edge of the wilderness that stands out. There are the glorious meals at Stefan and Denise’s that are really the bee’s knees, the wonderful Christmas bash that Phil and Julie put on a few weeks ago, any event with Craig and Laurel at their wonderful Aberdeen abode and then there are the barbecues. Whether they’re here at No1, or next door at No2 Riverside Drive; or whether they are under Roland to celebrate Ilsa’s endless 25th birthdays, they are always such a joy to me.
But events where the music is loud, the guests foreign to me and the alcohol flowing endlessly so all are legless after an hour or so – yuk! If they are where people delight in taking their clothes off – yuk, yuk!! If there are white powdered substances in abundance – yuk, yuk, yuk!!! But if I can be a voyeur at these – then that’s a different matter. Cinema makes this possible, with these two movies rejoicing in that.
Recently the duo of parties at the Gatsby mansion, superbly choreographed by Baz Lurhmann, were the benchmark, a treat in excess to watch – but now are ultimately lame compared to what Scorsese and Sorrentino have conjured up.
Boy, can those Italians party, ‘bunga bunga.’ As ‘The Great Beauty’ revved up from a start of striking vignettes to Jep’s party getting under way accompanied by the pounding beat of thumpa thumpa music, I was enthralled. These weren’t only young bucks and belles out for a high old time on the terraces of the host’s apartment within spitting distance of the Coliseum. His party-goers were all shapes and ages, as well as prominently featuring his dwarf editor, a miniature doppelganger of ‘Ab Fab’s’ Patsy. In their wild dancing all pushed their bodies and faces to the limit. It was toe-tappingly fantastic. With a rake’s grin and dangling fag, Jeb can party with the best of them and his sixty-fifth was going to be no exception. And what a face this guy (actor Toni Servillo) possesses; what an exquisite vehicle in his visage he has for expressing all the emotions known to humankind! Surely it’s one of the best in filmdom and to the best of my knowledge, it was the first time I’ve encountered it. In this role Servillo is simply magnificent. Many would argue, though, that the real star of the show is Rome itself. Never has the Eternal City looked so uniquely burnished with such a warm glow as when we tour known and secret places, following an array of characters as the film’s coterie slip giddily into Berlusconian decadence. The putrid ripeness of the Catholic Church casts a heavy stench over all the proceedings as the elite of Roman society let off steam before their collective number comes up as punishment for decades of unsustainable excess. They know the ‘dolce vita’ will soon be dead, along with many of their own number. The cinematography of this beast of a film is extraordinary – some of its images will long linger – the disappearing giraffe; the man who exhibits his self portraits (one for each day of his fifty odd years); the flamingoes coming to rest in their migration only to be blown away by the breath of a centenarian nun; the nude performer who entertains by stunning herself against stone wall; the swirling art work of a child prodigy artist; the set piece about the cosmetician and his scything injection – I could go on. It was a cornucopia for the senses, a Baroquian entree before the Inferno. Surely this must be the hot favourite for Best Foreign at the upcoming Oscars!
But even the full-on hoedowns portrayed in ‘The Great Beauty’ pall in comparison with the orgies orchestrated by ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ himself, Jordan Belfort, as gleefully played by Leonardo Di Caprio. He throws all the seven deadly sins at the wall, as well as dwarfs at targets, for the sleazy employees of his dodgy, greedy finance company/hedge fund, designed purely to rip off gullible punters in the run up to the GFC. Like most of its other porcine perpetrators, he got off virtually scot-free to re-invent himself into his present day reincarnation as a get rich quick spruiker – again for all those gullible punters out there. Compared to this portrayal of Belfort, Jeb is an angel. Jordan is the devil that leads all into Hades.
This movie must be one of the high-points of Scorsese’s career. There is little violence, a nauseating characteristic of some of his other lauded offerings – instead the auteur concentrates on drug taking, sex, nudity and wild abandon. Matthew McConaughey. is stellar as the mentor who prods Belfort into his evil and excessive ways – it is surely one of the best turns in a career that has now blossomed anew. Aussie soap starlet Margot Robbie leaves no part of anatomy covered in her turn as the finacier’s second missus, but displays actorly chops as well. In places this movie was guffaw-inducingly hilarious – the lasting example being when our ‘hero’ has to negotiate a few steps whilst out of his tiny cotton picking mind on some pills well past their use-by date – its up there with ‘The Hangover’s’ tiger in the bathroom for recent comedic insanity. The audience in attendance at my screening clapped and stomped their feet at the conclusion of this excessive kaleidoscope in joyous appreciation.
Both movies demand a staunch bladder with the length of their running time – but in the end I still wanted more, the bladder could wait. Of course Blind Freddie could see that Sorrentino was taking his cues from Fellini and with Scorsese? It is probably Luhrmann. I’d wager he’s not so subtly telling him, ‘Top this if you can, mate.’ Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the Aussie wunderkind took up the challenge and tackled some subject matter that involved really, really excessive partying too – now I’d pay to see that!!!
‘The Great Beauty’ official site = http://www.palacefilms.com.au/thegreatbeauty/
‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ official site = http://www.thewolfofwallstreet.com/index_splash.php
Geeveston Notable
'Consequences' – Penelope Lively
I blame Françoise, I really do – although I think I have already blamed her in part, along with Brigitte and Claudine, once before on this blog (see = http://blueroomriversidedrive.blogspot.com.au/2013/01/a-blue-room-book-review-delphine-de.html) . Then it was for my attraction for all matters French – why I have even taken an intrigued interest in recent times as to which of Francois Hollande’s lovers is actually to be the first lady of the nation. It now seems the younger one has won out. This time around I am blaming Françoise for my devotion to a certain genre of writing that I struggle to give a name to. Let me explain. I have an attachment to books, written by female authors, in the main UK female authors, who concentrate on falling in and out of love, on affairs – that type of activity in their novels. Is there a genre appellation to cover what I read? Would ‘romance’ suffice? It would seem rather unmanly of me to read ‘romance,’ wouldn’t it? That word conjures up ‘Mills and Boon’ type stuff and I would hope what I read has a tad more literary merit, even if not quite in the ‘Tess of the D’Urbervilles’ realm – but approaching that.
I cannot remember reading a complete oeuvre of a lady writer until I encountered Françoise during my uni days, over forty years ago now. I have no idea now what started me on those slim volumes you could pick up for less than a dollar back in those days of yore, but they were light, easily digestible – a salve to those weighty historical and political tomes of my enforced reading. I suppose there is a link to my yesteryear attraction to Ms Sagan and my love of French rom-coms today.
Once I was a bona fide contributor to the education of young people, with somewhat more cash in my pocket, I could branch out. I had been by now introduced to a new range of writers of the female persuasion who specialised in the travails of maintaining relationships in contemporary times. The coterie were headed by Andrea Newman, Margaret Drabble and Elizabeth Jane Howard – the recent passing of the latter saddening me. They produced works on the British middle to upper classes that I invariably found engrossing. Their mantle was passed on to the likes of Joanna Trollope, Caro Fraser, Amanda Brookfield, Angela Lambert, Sue Gee and Penelope Lively, amongst others. The term ‘aga saga’ was invented in the early 90s to describe the works of the first listed, but now loosely encompasses many more. It is defined as ‘being named for the AGA cooker, a type of stored-heat oven that came to be popular in medium to large country houses in the UK after its introduction in 1929. It refers primarily to fictional family sagas dealing with British middle-class country or village life.’ (Wikipedia) The latter author, Lively, it seems to me, has been around for ages and I have devoured most of her books. She is now eighty and still active.
Lively fits a great deal into ‘Consequences’. It appears a slimish volume but is three hundred pages or so in length – still, not much really to house the biographies of the three generations of women she crams in. Herein lies its only fault – this reader became so immersed in each protagonist’s journey that he didn’t enjoy leaving them to move on to the next. Still Lively adeptly segues from mother to daughter, commencing pre-war and finishing after the millennium had turned. There’s Laura, Molly and Ruth – all with great tales to tell over the novel’s eight parts. And, in the end, she brings it all deftly back to square one.
In my view Lively has always been a consummate wordsmith with her broad vocabulary embellishing her images with a sheen – be it life in a derelict rural cottage as the Blitz approaches, the vagaries of existence in a super-sized garret in the London of the 50s or in the adventures to be had touring a sun-blasted Crete in the search of the last resting place of a soldierly relative. Its all well-woven lovely, lovely stuff – about stuff that works out, about stuff that doesn’t – as is often the situation in real life. Like her other more recent offerings – ‘Passing On’, ‘Heatwave’, ‘Spider Web’ and ‘The Photograph’, I immensely enjoyed this saga published back in 2007. I intend catching up with her later offerings as well.
As a corollary to all this I once read everything a certain Mr Sparks wrote, even though my talented daughter kept telling me what he produced was total tosh. My beloved Kate will be amused to know that I now agree – that continuing to peruse him would be too unmanly – even for me!
Ms Lively’s website = http://www.penelopelively.net/
From my Doorstep
Letters
It didn’t take long, did it? Those following this blog know I’ve had my rant on this and my prediction has been proved prescient. It is, though, a subject close to my heart and I fear the worse, even if those greedy honchos at the top insist they’re just testing the water. Though it is enshrined in legislation, even though their organisation still makes massive profits with its other services, those Canadians (and, as it turns out, Kiwis) have started our lot thinking. Auspost has surveyed us – well some of us. How would we feel about paying $30pa for our mail delivery services? How would we feel about the postie coming, as in NZ, only thrice a week? As it turns out, in theory this punter wouldn’t be overly concerned about either as long as there are iron-clad assurances that this is where it would end. I doubt though that such assurances would be given such is, it seems, the notion that profit comes before all else. I fear it would be the thin edge of the wedge. And why is it that a mighty organisation cannot tolerate loss making in one sector of its operations, when its overall profit is gargantuan, in the name of a service to the community? All right, I know, the number of letters going through the system is decreasing, but the volume is still massive in anyone’s terms. I love writing letters, I love my philately – it means something to me. Not everything should be about profit excess! Will the greed of giant corporations ever be sated?
And that’s one of the aspects that delighted me about Spike Jonze’s ‘Her’ – letters still exist in his version of the not so distant future. In fact Joaquin Phoenix’s character, Theodore Twombly (bottler of a name), is employed to write heartfelt letters for a community no longer able/far too busy to express emotion on paper. In Jonze’s world people walk around conversing with hand held thingamajigs. Computer programmes have reached the stage where their ‘voices’ are no longer merely robotic – they have a ‘mind’ of their own and they have ‘feelings’ – perhaps two facilities the human race are starting to lose! In fact, the voice of the one possessed by Theo is downright sexy with the result our hero falls in love with ‘her’. Of course it would be quite easy for anyone to fall in love with any part of Scarlett Johansson orally playing ‘Samantha’. I spent periods of the movie with my eyes closed, just focusing on the two stars conversing – after all the camera was fixated on Phoenix’s face with little else going on. This is essentially a two hander with Amy Adams, Rooney Mara and Olivia Wilde ably taking on the minor roles, with the latter intriguing as Samantha’s surrogate attempting to have the real sex with Theo that Samantha is unable to carry out. It is Samatha’s voice directing proceedings. We do get a great deal of Joaquin in our faces and this film’s ending is enigmatic, but as a treatise on where the world is heading it provides some fodder for pondering. Where are we heading as far as social interaction is concerned? This movie will linger.
I do wonder about the world my generation leaves behind for my granddaughter’s. She is now a ‘big’ girl of almost twenty months and is starting to work out where she fits into the scheme of things, reaching out to the world around her with joy, wonder and acceptance. Already I am writing letters to her and I hope that, as she journeys through life, she knows the joy of, not only receiving mail, but also of sending out her happenings and thoughts through the post. Maybe she will also receive pleasure, as I do, in each new issue of stamps from Auspost, reflecting the innumerable variables of our great land. I wish that she’ll get the same positive feelings each time she places her tongue on the back of one of these mini works of art and affixes it to the corner of an envelope. And it is my great desire that I will be around for long enough to receive many letters from her to me.
But hooray and hooray. In Jonze’s opus books still exist!!!!
The movie’s website = http://www.herthemovie.com/#/home













