It stunned me that summery afternoon. I kept turning to look, then turning away to try and read my book or stare at Table Cape in the distance….and then, repeatedly turning back for short bursts. I was trying my best not to be a perv, but she was seemingly oblivious to me. It was difficult fighting back the urge, to fasten my eyes on her and not let go. But I erred on the side of caution. I liked, really liked what I saw – that was obvious, so much so that I still remember it to this day. There was the initial incredulous shock then, with my peeks, I lapped her up. It couldn’t last forever and I had to leave her, the sole blessing of that was that the path back up to the road would take me even closer to the figure supine on the beach that afternoon. It must have been back in the late seventies or early eighties that this occurred. And I do link it to the Hef- Hugh Hefner – that it did actually happen – that she had the chutzpah to enliven my day. Not directly, of course, was there this linkage, but I don’t think it’s too long a bow to draw. She was there, quite brazen and unfettered, seemingly not caring who saw her. She must of known I was looking, but she remained on her back, eyes closed and what I was fixated on pointing up to the blue sky. Would she had had the confidence to do it in broad daylight had Hef not thrown back the shackles on womanhood a couple of decades previously. Some might say he just replaced them with another set, but I, along with Clem following, do not wholly agree.

Things were already on the turn, thanks to those red-blooded European types, by the mid-fifties, but until Hef came along the strictures were still to be unpicked, at least from where we in the antipodes took our cues from – the UK and the US. There was the Hays Code, you know, with all that hung off it, like the banning of ‘Lady Chatterley’s Lover’ by the beige censorship men. But Hef, with a blond bombshell as his centrepiece, changed all that with the first issue of his magazine. Marilyn, short of a crust before she really struck pay-dirt in the movies, agreed to pose unburdened by clothing. Hef got hold of the prints and the rest is history. Didn’t pay her a cent, of course, nor ever apologised for using her body to bring him fortune and fame. But, to my way of thinking, HH had gone a long way towards placing another comparable golden vision before me that holiday afternoon.

I suppose the first time I did it it was akin to buying condoms at a pharmacy. It took a while to get up the courage. It was the Sandy Bay Newsagency where the monthly periodical waited for me. I’d been on a few scouting forays before I’d actually summoned the pluck to do the deed. I didn’t want to be seen hanging around the girlie section for too long. I didn’t want to be classed as a perv, you realise, for I wasn’t. Definitely not. I remember the issue was a big, thick one; the day I overcame my demons and went for it. I was at uni, of course. I was acutely interested in the freedoms that being on campus entailed, relatively speaking. After all, Tassie was so hicksville back then, even if Hobart had started to emerge a smidge. ‘Hair’ had come and we’d seen nudity on stage, as well as on the silver screen when I made trips to the Elwick Drive-in or the cinema now where Centrepoint is. They did, occasionally, show some pretty racy European product there. And then there was Alvin Purple. But at uni, especially in the degree I was doing (Arts), there was a cornucopia of delights to be had when casting an eye over the female student cohort, especially in the few summer months we were there before one and all rugged up for the long winter. Remember this was the time of cheesecloth and it was hip to not wear a bra. Those young ladies, all being at least reasonably intelligent, knew the power, hard won, they possessed in their futures, thanks to Greer, Friedan, Steinem et al. And they certainly knew the power they had over us poor dribbling males in the way they dressed. You’d be laughed at if Hef was included in that list of feminists – but the notion isn’t as silly as it may first appear. But, yep, he also did much to blot his copy-book as well – just in case you think I’ve completely gone off my trolley. But, at that marvellous time, being quite a shy boy from the sticks, I certainly wasn’t getting much action in my first few years as a boarder at an all male residential hall. I needed an outlet – and, once I found my way to the counter at that newsagency, his mag, hidden amongst various newspapers and a couple of worthy journals in the pile I took to the counter – perhaps a Time or a Rolling Stone – to pass over as well. I wouldn’t want to be outed as a total perv, Hef provided that outlet too.

Hand on my heart, I did read the articles. Everybody knows that Playboy had great writers contributing, as well as great bodies. But for me the mag’s main game was obvious. But I generally couldn’t see much attraction in the centrefolds though. To me those Playmates of the Month weren’t real – in little way did they resemble the girls that attracted me around the lecture theatres and tutorial rooms of uni. Even clothed they were far more alluring. But pictorial collections headed ‘Girls Next Door’ or ‘The Girls of France’ – well, now we’re talking. To me their states of uncladedness were the complete enticement to my imagination. Occasionally there were celebrities of repute – Ursula Andress, Joan Collins, Madonna and so on – but again, for me they were no match for ‘The Girls of UCLA’ or ‘Girls on Spring Break’, back in the day. Perhaps it was because they seemed far more attainable.

Almost as clearly as that captivating vision on Cooee Beach that arvo long, long ago, I vividly recall that purchase of my first Playboy. After that it became easier, but I bet it wasn’t the only item I passed across the counter each time, particularly if it was a lady on duty. And I stuck to Playboy down through the following years. There was a brief flirtation with Penthouse, but that publication’s articles weren’t up to scratch. I’m serious, really. I had little interest in the raunchier breed that followed – Hustler, Mayfair, Club International and so on. Beautiful breasts were what had my blood running – the lasses who appeared in these more revealing spin-offs were far too forward for my liking. No tease at all.

Yep, it was a lovely time to be around, from the early seventies into the eighties until the fun police, ‘slip, slop, slap’ and the digital age took it all away. These eventually combined to end my beach-going days, at least as far as sun-bathing was concerned. But from my earliest years, until well into my fifties, any beach was a magnet for me. I loved getting a tan, reading a book on a beach towel and breaking it up a little by watching the passing parade. With trips to places such as Noosa, Byron and Surfers during this period, my beach-watching included a fair amount of toplessness. At these meccas of brown bodies I’d frequently amble up and down the strands and dip my toes in the Pacific. Actually going for a swim never appealed in the slightest. I can’t deny that seeing half-naked women didn’t tantalise when I came upon them. But I tried to be discreet, in my ogling, by keeping a fair distance from them; giving them a wide berth. I wouldn’t want to be thought of as a perv, being only on the beach for one thing, would I?

Now back to that summer in question. Once upon a time I lived just across the Bass Highway from the shores of Bass Strait and for most of the time Cooee Beach was a peaceful spot, far less crowded than Hilder Parade or West Beach, both fronting Burnie’s CBD. I know, that day, she wasn’t there when I arrived, otherwise my towel wouldn’t have been as close to hers as it was. I would have paraded down the beach to put a more respectable distance between her topless display and myself. But, at some stage, I changed position to face the opposite way and there she was. Fulsome of figure, red bikini bottom and blonde-haired – perhaps early thirties, it seemed to me. She was tanned all over, so obviously dispensing with her top wasn’t anything new for her. I have often thought many times since why she’d positioned herself so close to me when she had an almost empty vista of sand to choose from? I’ll never know the answer to that, perhaps she figured I looked harmless (I was) and that being so near would provide some protection in case a more in-her-face type turned up and gave her a hard time. Eventually I had to depart and again, passing her – but not too closely – I wouldn’t want her thinking I was a perv – afforded me a closer view of her tantalising bosoms.

I went eagerly back across the road for weeks, after that, on sunny days, but she never re-appeared. Her wondrous disporting of herself has never left me though. Please don’t think I’m dwelling on this or that I’m weird. For me, it’s just a lovely memory – so totally unexpected in normally staid Burnie.

Now in recent decades Hefner has become a bit of a joke and he was certainly one of yesterday’s men, wasn’t he? But once upon a time he did create a climate for change and bucked the mores of the period. Not all he did was positive for women, we know that. But, as with Clem B following, seeing old stock of the magazine, from its glory years, still brings back a sense of nostalgia. It’s there for all the times I spent wandering around the university grounds in the four years I lived at that hall of residence. For me the campus was a wonderland of earthly delights and then, of course, there was my own personal blonde bombshell on Cooee Beach. Can we still buy US Playboy here. I know the Aussie version has long ceased publication. If I find the former, will I buy one? I know the ‘Girls of Summer’ won’t be there anymore as all its famed nudity has now been expunged from its pages, but will the articles still stand up? And does Hef deserve to RIP? Well, that’s for you to decide.

Clem Bastow on Hugh Hefner’s legacy = http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity/hugh-hefners-legacy-is-as-much-a-quandary-as-his-playboy-magazine-20170928-gyqy4g.html

Sad. It made me a tad sad. It was a small thing really, a tiny fragment of my life – but I’ll will miss, nonetheless, the small pleasures it provided. They informed me greatly; introduced me to artists, photographers and were the perfect letter fillers, suitable for short messages to all the wonderful souls on my mailing lists. I knew where they were located in and around the city of Hobart and if in their vicinity, I would visit and select handfuls. But now this minor delight of an activity has been taken away from me, yet another victim of the digital age and funding cuts to the arts.

The idea came to Pat Mackie on her travels last century. She saw something similar during her time in Copenhagen and figured it could work in Oz too. She set up her business around the notion in 1992. And Australia was ready for it as our appreciation of the arts had matured to be the equal of any other western society, even if our governments often had more pressing needs than helping foster artistic talent.

Over the years people like me have savoured the free post-cards Ms Mackie’s company had produced. They were to be found in stands all around our major burbs. For some time they were excellent in getting names out there that otherwise would not have had the same exposure. The cards weren’t solely devoted to the arts; they promoted other products as well, but they were a great advertisement for painters, camerasnappers and our magnificent land, sea and cityscapes. Avant cards gave exposure to the up-and-comers yet to achieve mainstream acceptance or outlets, as well as advertising exhibitions and literary events. The entrepreneur’s idea ended up creating 20,000 campaigns and distributing 250 million post cards. Ms Mackie proudly tells the story of an aunt who wrote weekly letters to her nephew, topping them up with these cards. Said nephew had been battling his ice addiction but he eventually became clean. When the aunt finally visited him he proudly displayed, to her his bedroom, the walls of which were completely covered with the Avant product she had sent him over the duration. He said contemplating his walls focused his mind away from his craving for the substance.

Now I am a wall plasterer from way back so I can relate to the above story, even if my infatuation with the product was/is much smaller in its positive consequence. One of the locations for my collecting was the Moonah Arts Centre and it was there I picked up ‘Elvis Has Left the Building’. Until I closely examined this card I had no idea that it would mark the end of an era. It was Avant’s swan-song.

There is an up-side though. The National Library of Australia is in talks with Pat Mackie to house the complete collection of Avant cards, every lovely issue. Also, another positive is that, because of my penchant for taking handfuls of the freebies, it has left me with a treasure trove that will last me for a few more years of contemplating and researching what strikes my eye – as well as letter filling.

He’d reckoned he’d seen it all, the film critic on Trevor Chappell’s Overnights show for local ABC radio stations all around Oz. He’d seen it all, had Tom Cushing, until he’d came up against the two movies he’d viewed recently. And I’d just happened to be awake to hear his recounting the impact they had on him. They were both from the horror genre and he had surmised he was inured from all that ilk of film could throw at him. But, for very different reasons, ‘It’ and ‘Mother’ got to him. ‘Solid’ was his description of the first offering, a Stephen King adaptation. Australia’s own Hugo Weaving and Ben Mendelsohn were both, at stages, mooted for the lead role, but Tom reckoned Bill Skarsgård, son of Stellan, did a solid (that word again) job as the evil clown. Mr Cushing opined that there was nothing up there on the actual screen that fazed him – he’d seen it all before, as we have mentioned. But what he wasn’t prepared for was the reaction of the guy sitting next to him who was really into it and possibly hadn’t had the same exposure to the shocks that abound in the more frightening scenes of horror fare. When the nasty jokester suddenly appeared out of nowhere, to the children involved, it was too much for the poor fellow seated aside Tom and he grabbed our unsuspecting reviewer for all he was worth to be protected from the excruciating scariness unfolding. That was a first for Tom. The horror jaded critic had another shock in store when he took in the second movie, ‘Mother’. The Jennifer Lawrence vehicle truly, truly unsettled him. It was like no other horror number he’d seen in his long years. He told his listeners that he thought about leaving the cinema several times during its length and warned that, if you are in any way the slightest bit faint of heart, then this may not be the film for you. He continued on by saying he didn’t have the words to describe the terror he witnessed on the screen, nor the feelings for what he saw induced in the pit of his stomach. I myself loved director Darren Aronofsky’s marvellous ‘The Wrestler’ and to a lesser extent, ‘Black Swan’. But listen to these on-line headlines for ‘Mother’. Rolling Stone cautioned ‘It will make your head explode.’ and ‘The Verve’ added its tuppence worth by calling it the year’s most hated film. Patently, it’s not for me.

No, unlike my partner’s daughter (dare you to see ‘Mother’, Ilsa?), who thrives on being frightened out of her wits, I was put off horror long ago. Way back in the misty past, at the Somerset Drive-in to be precise, with avians flying all around in the evening air, I had the misfortune, as with James Norman, of seeing Hitchcock’s ‘The Birds’. From that point on it took something special (‘The Shining’, a few of M. Night Shyamalan’s oeuvre) to entice me to be scared at the cinema again.

And in reality, there are some birds that bring out a little touch of fear in all of us. For James Norman and my Leigh’s brother Phil, the former Gold Coast postie, it is the magpie during spring’s swooping season. For me and I suspect, dozens of other Tasmanians, it is our own protected spur-winged plover. As a kid, I never felt any joy teasing these, what I thought of then as vicious feathered fiends, till they rose skywards en masse, only to plummet down towards their quarry. My pals would be screaming out in mock terror, running around hell for leather and having the time of their young lives, despite the fact their uncovered noggins were seemingly in acute danger. Yes, some of my mates thrived on the fun of stirring up a congregation of plovers.

I remember once, during my time at Yolla School in country Tasmania, we had, as a guest to address an assembly, a mainland environmentalist who enthused, to the glazed multitude before him, about the amazing number of plovers there were around the school precinct. He related that they were fairly rare in his neck of the woods. But here, especially in rural areas, plovers are a part of the fabric of everyday life, not thought of until the instant realisation strikes that two spurred wings are descending from the heavens with cruel intent. Barely is their time to worry about one’s skull or, heaven forbid, eyes before we are instinctively ducking for cover. Of course the bird is too acting on instinct, namely to protect their nestlings – but it often makes being around our urban fringes and open countryside most uncomfortable on occasions.

Over the years rumours have abounded of deaths caused by a spur penetrating into the brain or a cornea, but methinks that unlikely. But I often wonder what happens when a plover gets its timing slightly wrong?

There was an incident of Hitchcokian potential that happened to me a dozen or so years ago; one that has continued to give me nightmares, along with the original movie. I was far from civilisation that particular day, alone with my camera, on some open wetlands, when I came under stuka-like attack from a bevy of plovers. They dived-bombed me repeatedly as I dashed for the cover of a faraway tree. I felt the disturbance of air caused by the flapping of wings as my assailants flashed in very close in to my ears. Once, under the protection of its branches, they desisted and landed. There ensued a waiting game. Now and again there would be a squawk, a plover no doubt warning me that, if I exposed myself, my demise would be imminent. ‘You poke your ugly visage out mate and we’ll have you.’ They would not go away, I was not game to move. As the afternoon grew greyer and more foreboding I decided to make my escape. Inexplicably, as I crept away as low to the ground as possible, they didn’t bat an eyelid. For some reason they had collectively deduced I was no longer a threat as I made my way cautiously to my automobile. I drove off quite speedily. On my journey home all I could think of was that shocker of a movie where Rod Taylor, Jessica Tandy and Tippi Hendren are terrorised by feathered marauderers. It all came throttling back to me.

Despite coming eye to eye with a deadly flotilla of armoured-faced avians that day, I am now in admiration of these feisty creatures of the skies. Mother nature does bite back and they are its champions. They ensure we, the alpha-males of the natural world, do not have it all our own way. They are not deadly, but they warrant our respect. Its great that there is still so much in the animal world that can replicate the terror that happens in Hollywood horror Here we get the right royal heebie-jeebies from creatures a fraction of our size. It just takes a Hitchcock to start the ball rolling and put the doubt in our minds.

James Norman’s article = http://www.smh.com.au/comment/even-a-swooping-magpie-is-a-reminder-of-the-natural-world-20170911-gyevsi.html

They were men of a regional and industrial town, were Fred and Rupert. They were blue collar, white singleted, gladstone bag toting, Labor-leaning and salt of the earth types. They had an affinity with the bush and to them hard yakka was a constant, not a glib expression. One heaved a bus around the burbs of the North West, the other was part of Burnie’s largest workforce, making paper. The raw material for this was wrenched from our island’s pristine forests without thought. Once upon a time paper was king, but not anymore. Once the government owned and operated the bus service, but not any more. During the working lives of Fred and Rupert manufacturing, mining, forestry and fishing knew no bounds – little ruminating time was set aside for tomorrow or future generations. They both had their passions, of course, but money was always tight – little spare for splurges and they knew the great art of making do. Rampant consumerism was decades away. They had known economic depression and world conflict – and well knew what both could do to dreams. Rupert and Fred built lives for themselves in an industrial town, married well and for life, raising a family.

Of course and sadly, the generation that knew Rupert and Fred is almost gone and yes, Bernard Salt, they did display some elements of Green thinking. Out of necessity they did so – because the alternative was the road to ruin. I liked what you scribed, Mr Salt, but, really, it’s drawing a long bow. I wonder, often, what the likes of Fred and Rupert would have made of today’s world. They would have adapted. They were nothing, that generation, if they were unable to adapt.

The eldest sons of Fred and Rupert bonded in that industrial town – a town blighted by belching smoke-stacks and a toxic sea. These two eldest sons shared enough in common to bring them together – the same classes at school and a fondness for the Burnie Football Club. One would take the other, in his car with the suicide doors, to watch the Tigers play, up and down that coast, come rain, hail and those howling winter westerlies. In the big picture one was a Collingwood tragic, the other was in the process of making the change from the Saints to be blessed by following the ‘piss and the poo’, as the other cruelly referred to the mighty Hawks. One loved the gees-gees and tennis – he was almost unbeatable on the local scene in his pomp. The other’s passion fell more the way of music and literature. As adulthood approached they both found themselves in a position to do what would have been unthinkable for Fred and Rupert at the same point in their lives. A generous government made it possible, with some family scrimping and scraping, to head south to university.

At UTAS – it was never called that back then – the duo of eldest sons was joined by a blond-haired, blue-eyed offspring of a Red Hills farmer, thus immeasurably upping the quotient of good looks possessed by the trio. Through the four years of tertiary study, living at a residential hall (lads only), the three were as thick as thieves; the best of mates.

At some stage during these formative years one of the eldest sons was drawn to a movement. The members of it were trying to save a lake; a lake like no other. Pristine, in the wilderness of the South West, its wide beach of shimmering sand was unique. It was earmarked to go under in the name of progress and jobs. An election was imminent and the little group decided to put up candidates as a means of getting the message out. Thus was formed the United Tasmania Group (UTG), now recognised as the planet’s first Green political party. The eldest son of Rupert was, proudly, a founding member.

Uni finished, careers called and the inseparable trio began to drift apart. Marriage and eventually children came their way, new friendships arose; new priorities.

The Original Green married another warrior for the cause – a woman who became leader at both state and federal levels, following the remarkable Bob Brown. This eldest son devoted himself to raising his family and teaching how to be humane and socially conscious to a legion of students down through the decades.

Sadly the marriage didn’t last and times grew harder for the son of Rupert, that original Green. An illness of body and mind took its toll and he made the decision to move back to that industrial town – to family and his roots.

And, one evening, the two old mates reconnected. A new chapter began in both lives. For very different reasons each was in need of companionship and they gave each other that in spades. Fridays nights at 15 Lane Street became something the son of Fred looked forward to every week. He prepared an evening meal, then settled back with the Original Green to watch the footy on tele – as long as Hawthorn wasn’t playing his pal’s beloved Maggies. The OG would become quite animated, particularly if the umpire made a blue. With both fortified by liberal amounts of cheap reds, much bullshit was spoken, grandiose plans were made and world problems solved.

By now the son of Rupert had another passion – the plight of Burmese minorities – and he spent much time in South East Asia helping out with their cause. It was in that region there occurred his watershed moment – the instant that changed his life markedly for the better. In a Bangkok temple he spotted a Thai village girl releasing a dove to the sky. He thought it was a magical instant, that it was a rare and beautiful thing that he was gifted the witnessing of. To his credit he made his feelings known to the young lady – and finally this son of a Burnie Pulp worker had found his soul mate. It was a deep and abiding love that would survive till the end.

When he was back in Tassie, now accompanied by his new partner, ever widening her horizons, the Friday nights continued – continued with the bonus of her company.

The other Burnie son had by now transitioned from a Labor voter to embrace the Greens, but he was definitely a lighter hue to his best mate. Great arguments were had in great spirit, as one couldn’t bring himself to go the whole hog. He was quite happy for there to be roads into the Tarkine, a cable car to proceed up kunanyi’s ramparts and sensitive tourist developments in the wilderness. To the other that was all sacrilege – a line in the sand just had to be drawn and he was prepared to do that. And don’t dare call this original Green dark. He was true Green – end of the matter.

The two eldest sons had much to look forward to. Son of Fred was invited by son of Rupert to join himself and his beautiful lady to sample village life in Thailand. A plan was hatched to travel to Sydney to reconnect with that son of a Red Hills farmer.

At least the latter partly came about. For, you see, that eldest son, that original Green, that son of Rupert is now engaged in a battle that he knows he cannot win. By the time this is read it may already be lost. But he is fighting it valiantly. Radical new drug therapy may give him some more time and for that he has had the need to fly to Harbour City. On one of these trips he was blessed by the third member of the old uni threesome paying him a visit. The Original Green returned to the former industrial town with such joy in his heart from that encounter – and he gave much joy relating it back to the other member.

So my dearest, oldest and most valued friend is preparing to make the journey up there to beyond the silver lining as Fred, Rupert and the Red Hills farmer have done before him. He is slipping away as I write – but throughout these last weeks and months he has been courageous, stoic and positive. His gorgeous Meimi has tendered him all the way with all that bounteous love she possesses. I will, when the final time comes, grieve for an irreplaceable loss, for what now cannot occur and for those raucous Friday nights of blathery and jest. When it comes, something rare and special will have been lost. My life has been immeasurably enhanced by his presence in it and I too, as soon as is possible, will make a journey to Sydney.

RIP Neville H Milne (27th September, 1952 – 28th October, 2017)

Bernard Salt’s Column = http://www.theaustralian.com.au/life/weekend-australian-magazine/conservation-a-part-of-life-for-past-generations/news-story/c697b4cc381f6fbde7e2c40a245ce357

You see, Mr Salt, I blame Hugh – Hugh Grant. It was his performance in the inspired opening scenes to ‘Four Weddings and a Funeral’ that bought the F-Bomb in from the cold, I reckon. From out of the mouths of Salt’s ne’er-do-wells and into the oral orifices of the mainstream it came and came again until now it is a torrent. You see Grant’s repeated utterances of the expletive, as he belatedly readied himself for an engagement, went a great deal of the way into making that vehicle for his limited, but exceedingly engaging, acting talents into a romantic, much adored classic.

Then along came Ian McShane who turned the F-Bomb into an art form. His late career signature role in ‘Deadwood’, as the aptly named Al Swearengen, made it a hit. His foul blasphemies, centred on the four-lettered once reviled word, as he orchestrated his latest dastardly deed, I have little doubt will ever be equalled, despite Peter Capaldi’s best efforts in ‘The Thick Of It’.

Now that f**k is off the leash, romping unrestrained in society, it is bringing, from the outer, like terms in in its wake. It is in everyday conversation, even though in living memory it was only once uttered by those beyond the pale. But, nowadays. even the c-word is getting in on the act. The question is: what will fill the void as the outliers of the English language? The candidates, as put forward by Salt, do not seem to roll off the tongue as well as those which were once ignored by truly proper people.

But, despite its popularity in the digital age’s vernacular, I, like BS, still in some circumstances, consider it offensive. I have ceased to be shocked by a f-word up on the big screen or down on the little, but still find it hard to take when popular music is repeatedly peppered with them. Something like ‘Little Lion King’ is fine, or the glorious refrain to ‘Am I Ever Gonna See Your Face Again’ (No Way Get Fruited). But the abomination of some rap supposed tunes is a bridge too far, with it and other low-life terms, shouted out ad nauseam and with gay abandon, being an anathema to me. Nor do I prefer to use it in my everyday speech. I may, on occasion, utter it with a fair amount of liquid on board. I may quietly exclaim it to myself when untangling a knotty problem (usually associated with modern technology). But for some it seems it is as common now in everyday lingo as much as the ubiquitous ‘like’ between every phrase with the younger brigade is. For me, its continual usage by somebody marks that person as one that ideally I wouldn’t like to have any dealings with. Is that my age, or perhaps the teacher in me? Once upon a time I fought a losing battle against it in the school playground, but never tolerated it in my classroom. Perhaps it is because deep, deep down I may be just a tad prudish. I was certainly never brought up to use it and I too find it’s use by pretty young lasses quite confronting. I am sure the younger me would never have been attracted to such potty mouthed girls, despite the number of other attractive assets they may have had at their disposal.

So, yes, I am in Mr Salt’s camp here, being somewhat perplexed by its commonplaceness and being not prone to use it in my scribblings. And if anyone doesn’t like that they can, well, get fruitcaked!

Bernard Salt’s Column – http://www.theaustralian.com.au/life/weekend-australian-magazine/on-the-offensive-the-fword/news-story/8f59619eacb94eec39ff0b2958401eb8